T. Schoolkate
To Win
H. Chung
To Win
Guido Pella vs Hyeon Chung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W L L L
Form
W W W W W W W L W WHead-2-Head: Pella 1 - 1 Chung
They have played 5 sets in total, with Pella winning 2 and Chung winning 3. The last match between Pella and Chung was at the BMW Open - Munich, 06-05-2017, Semifinals, Clay with Guido Pella getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Guido Pella | 1 |
| Hyeon Chung | 1 |
BMW Open - Munich(06-05-2017)
4
6
7
5
6
4
| Pella | Stats | Chung |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 84% (21-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 604 | Ranking | 438 |
| 20 | Highest Rank | 19 |
| 34 | Age | 28 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 21 | Titles | 17 |
| 59% (498-343) | Career Total W/L | 66% (277-142) |
| $3,226,183 | Career Prize Money | $2,529,406 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Keys VS Kalinskaya PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Guido Pella
Player
Hyeon Chung
68%
(
75 of
111)
1st Serve %
72%
(
81 of
112)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
52 of
81)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
112)
113
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Guido Pella
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 23 | Games Won | 27 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:5:29 | Average Match Time | 2:5:29 |
| 67% (120/178) | 1st Serve % | 72% (125/173) |
| 68% (82/120) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (88/125) |
| 47% (27/58) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (24/48) |
| 20% (4/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 32% (6/19) |
| 35% (61/173) | Return Points Win % | 39% (69/178) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Guido Pella Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Guido Pella
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
26
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
38 of
46)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
22 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
26 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(5) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Guido Pella
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Guido Pella
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guido Pella
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
41 of
51)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
30 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Guido Pella
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
66 of
88)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
19 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
103
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(1) 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guido Pella
Player
Harold Mayot
78%
(
112 of
143)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
112)
5
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
55 of
73)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
36%
(
52 of
143)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
130
Total Points Won
125
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guido Pella
Player
Borna Coric
72%
(
115 of
160)
1st Serve %
73%
(
95 of
131)
7
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
80 of
115)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
71 of
95)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
34%
(
55 of
160)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
44 of
131)
149
Total Points Won
142
|
6-3 7-5 4-6 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Guido Pella
56%
(
53 of
95)
1st Serve %
72%
(
75 of
104)
9
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
4
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guido Pella
Player
Marcos Giron
71%
(
76 of
107)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Guido Pella
52%
(
64 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
70 of
106)
8
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
58%
(
35 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
46 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
120
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hyeon Chung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
James Kent Trotter
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Constant Lestienne
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
26 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Hyeon Chung
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Li Tu
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Colin Sinclair
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Yusuke Kusuhara
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Naoki Tajima
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (498/343) | Win/Loss | 66% (277/142) |
| 56% (1153/903) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (632/376) |
| 52% (10252/9338) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5074/4137) |
| 49% (82/85) | Hard Win/Loss | 70% (223/97) |
| 64% (387/221) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (30/21) |
| 47% (16/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (22/16) |
| 41% (13/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 2410 | Aces Total | 1187 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1533 | Total Double Faults | 1012 |
| 1:10:10 | Average Match Time | 1:23:55 |
| 516.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 162.21 |
| 64% (28323/43941) | 1st Serve % | 63% (14964/23933) |
| 69% (19472/28323) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (10554/14964) |
| 51% (7977/15618) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4545/8969) |
| 41% (1764/4258) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1206/2683) |
| 39% (17256/44153) | Return Points Win % | 41% (10325/24930) |
| 49% (36/37) | Slam W/L | 58% (22/16) |
| 40% (23/34) | Masters W/L | 52% (17/16) |
| 56% (10/8) | Cups W/L | 83% (10/2) |
| 51% (96/94) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (59/47) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (203/106) | Challenger W/L | 71% (96/40) |
| 67% (130/63) | Futures W/L | 78% (73/21) |
| 60% (459/760) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (246/373) |
| 44% (29/66) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 68% (28/41) |
| 51% (148/293) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (67/126) |
| 57% (165/287) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (68/115) |
| 88% (462/406) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (273/239) |
| 12% (462/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (273/34) |
| 24% (378/91) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (146/38) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
